Q and A on Limerence

 

Q: The literature on romantic love is voluminous and gets larger every day. What does your book have to say that is different enough and important enough that people should bother to read it? Hasn't everything that could be said about this subject already been said?

DT: Not by a long shot. Descriptions abound, but with the exception of some writings by evolutionary anthropologists, almost everything written on being in love is either romantic description or moralistic advice-giving.

 

Q: So what's wrong with advice?

DT: Everything if you are dealing with limerence. Since limerence is involuntary and extremely tenacious, to advise a person to do what that person absolutely would love to do but cannot, is not helpful. Ironically, the feedback from readers is that Love and Limerence is helpful in one way at least. They say that it tells them they are not alone in the craziness. It helps to be able to say to yourself that that although caught in a crazy state, it's also a normal state and one in which, when things are going right, produces the most intense joy known to human experience. Limerence means an irrationally overpowering condition. It appears to operate independently of other aspects of the person's character or personality.

 

Q: Love and Limerence is categorized in the book stores as a self-help book and yet you say you don't give advice. Isn't that a contradiction?

DT: I would have placed it in the psychology section, specifically, in the evolutionary psychology or even the human biology section, if there was one. Love and Limerence is descriptive, not proscriptive. In this, it is most accurately characterized as human ethology.

 

Q: So what, exactly. is limerence?

DT: Through the stories of hundreds of informants, a consistent pattern arose from the vagueness and variety like the Loch Ness monster rising from the mist, vague at first, but when further exposed, undeniable.

 

Q: So that consistent pattern is what you call limerence?

DT: Exactly.

 

Q: And what is that pattern?

DT: There is just one person who is its object and intensity as measured by bodily sensations (e.g., yearning felt in sternum area) and thought intrusion is a predictable function of the perceived behavior of the person who is its object. Limerence is without reliable overt behavioral markers and can exist for long periods in secret.

 

Q: It doesn't sound very rational.

DT: It isn't. That's why some people refer to it as love madness. It's something that happens to you, not something you do. Although this may not be how it feels at the time, this is how it is viewed retrospectively, especially when it has been unhappy and prolonged.

 

Q: Doesn't limerence refer to an extreme condition?

DT: No, it refers to a state that can become extreme. Extreme cases tend to be over represented in voluntary data. Limerence is what the human ethologist calls "open." It is not an instinct that plays out in an inevitable sequence of phases but is rather dependent for its course and intensity on external factors.

 

Q: What do you mean by "external factors"?

DT: I mean the behavior of others, especially that of the person whose reciprocation is its object. It is also affected by circumstances such as parental or societal objections.

 

Q: Do you mean that it can be induced by parental support?

DT: On the contrary, it is strengthened by externally-imposed barriers.

 

Q: As in Romeo and Juliet?

DT: Yes.

 

Q: But if it is called "love madness," doesn’t limerence sometimes exist in a pathological form, one that creates a stalker, or a "fatal" attraction?

DT: I draw a blank on that. Glenn Close’s character seems an exaggerated caricature in comparison with anything I've seen. The answers, maybe even procedures that will reduce the dangers, may come from research that brings the ability to identify it unambiguously in a given individual.

 

Q: How do you explain the mixed reactions to limerence on the part of scientists and journalists?

DT: The reactions of colleagues and journalists have been mixed in a manner explainable by limerence theory itself. One reacts, at least initially, according to one’s own experience. The history of science is rife with examples of resistance when scientific knowledge replaced prior belief. But it is in the nature of science that it will win out in the end. With more scientific knowledge of this aspect of human reproduction, people will react to the knowledge, regardless of personal experience just as today we conceptualize the earth as a globe despite experiences of apparent flatness.

 

Q: What has been learned about limerence in the two decades since Love and Limerence?

DT: There were some differences between the image of limerence based on prepublication research and the new data that came largely through the mail. Those few differences are not lethal to the main ideas. For example, my initial conceptions did not place the possible age of first limerence over so broad a range as that reported by readers of Love and Limerence. They also suggest that first limerence can occur at any adult age. (It might also occur at younger ages, but children don't write letters to authors.) Post-publication data also suggest a greater incidence of secret and long-sustained limerence than was suggested by the original data. Durations were not always specified, but among those who indicated the length of their limerence, no duration was less than three years, which is a longer minimal duration of (unreturned) limerence than we had previously assumed.

 

Q: What is the relationship between limerence and sex?

DT: Limerence is a sexual response. Union that includes sex is the goal of limerence. On the other hand, sexual attraction often occurs in the absence of limerence, and sex in the absence of emotional commitment does not satisfy limerence desire.

 

Q: What happens when limerence is satisfied?

DT: "Requited" limerence initiates a euphoric honeymoon period followed by a slow decline in experienced intensity. It's a well known pattern.

 

Q: Is there any real difference between being limerent and not being limerent?

DT: Those who gave testimony say yes, but there may be times when limerence is at low ebb, either in a mutual relationship, or during final stages of hopelessness, at which limerence is barely noticeable. It is a matter to be settled at the physiological level. Some researchers are exploring behavioral and physiological measures (e.g., brain wave patterns and hormonal secretions) associated with social and sexual partnerships in humans and in other animals. Eventually, physiological detection of limerence may be possible.

 

Q: Would you say that limerence is a new and previously unidentified disease to which some may be immune?

DT: When we know the physiological mechanisms, we may find that some are indeed immune, but evidence against the possibility that some people lack the mechanism are cases in which limerence occurred for the first time late in life. And although it resembles a disease in some ways, I see it as a normal adaptation, an instinctual reaction, if you will, that through the course of evolutionary history proved valuable to species endurance.

 

Q: Is it possible to avoid limerence?

DT: Some have reported wishing to avoid it but being unable to do so. Since at the beginning of an attraction that will become limerent, you feel both free and happy (you walk on air), it is hard to resist once it starts.

 

Q: Wasn’t your nonrandom, self-initiated sampling method inadequate?

DT: That depends on questions asked and conclusions drawn. If one is interested in differences in limerence incidence among various groups of people, a serious biasing factor in my database is that those who achieve full and quick reciprocation or those unfamiliar with the state do not submit testimony. But the only conclusion I draw from the evidence obtained thus far is that the state exists in some people. A single case would also enable that conclusion to be drawn. From the data of several hundred, even if they were mostly limerent at the time and self-selected, it appears that limerence is not rare, a. conclusion further borne out by literature, especially biography.

 

Q: You have mentioned social problems that limerence research might encounter or even bring about?

DT: There are social problems that better understanding of the phenomenon might help. For example, the danger to families and children might be reduced.

 

Q: What are the basic categories of people regarding limerence?

DT: There are three possibilities: (1) those who have experienced limerence in the past, but are no longer in its grip (2) those who are currently limerent, (3) those who have not (yet) experienced limerence. The categories do not represent types of people but the status of a person at any given time. There seems to be a tendency for limerence status to be maintained, but this can change during a person's lifetime.

 

Q: Isn't it also true that people who are limerent criticize their nonlimerent lovers calling them "cold," " unfeeling," and "unable to truly love"?

DT: Yes, and knowing about limerence might help LOs to understand better what is going on and what to do. Generally, this means breaking an impossible relationship cleanly by declaring nonlimerence (although even that is not a sure-fire strategy). But surely, if limerence were better understood, it might be better controlled.

 

Q: Much that is written about romantic love is advice. Do you have any opinions about the effectiveness of advice to the lovelorn?

DT: Advice givers are more effective when they recognize that advice to a nonlimerent might not be suitable for a limerent person. The snap out of it approach does not work with an involuntary condition. Most letters to me did not ask for advice. If they read the book, they knew that there was no advice I could give that was not implied by knowledge of the laws of limerence. But among the few who did ask a question or for help, this is a gem: "Dr. Tennov. Please help me. I cannot tell my psychiatrist. He'd think I'm crazy". It sounded like a joke at first, but even if a joke, the person differentiated between whatever was or might be the subject of psychotherapy and the distress resulting from unrequited limerence. In other words, limerence is distinguished from the condition for which a person might seek therapy.

 

Q: Are you implying that psychotherapy is not helpful?

DT: It depends. Some therapists have reported using Love and Limerence as a kind of adjunct, but disastrous results, saddest of all being limerence for the psychotherapist, have been reported.

 

Q: Can limerence really be hidden?

DT: I think it can be hidden and often is known only to the limerent person. The pangs of severe limerence pain can be covered over by a seemingly calm and even joyful exterior.

 

Q: What about the other side of the coin, the problem of having someone develop limerence with you as an object. How is that best handled when you do not return the feelings?

DT: First of all, be careful not to assume yourself to be an LO based on actions equally consistent with friendship or nonlimerent sexual attraction. Being a nonlimerent object of limerence is not pleasant, although the willingness of the limerent person to cater to your demands, including monetary and sexual demands, puts that person at risk of exploitation, sometimes exploitation that is inadvertent on the part of LO.

 

End of Q & A on limerence

 

Copyright © 1999 Dorothy Tennov All Rights Reserved